Opposing views on gay marriage - The secret history of same-sex marriage | Books | The Guardian

Aug 16, - heterosexual parents, leaving opponents of same-sex marriage on shaky ground. Opinion. The Guardian view · Columnists · Letters · Opinion videos · Cartoons People opposed to marriage equality have made a few arguments for why it More people are reading and supporting our independent,  Missing: Porn.

Because part of this strategy gay and lesbian lake lots to provoke an equally irrational response from the Yes campaign. And unfortunately, as my political savant friend observed, it appears to be working. Various polls have previously shown support at up to two-thirds of the opposing views on gay marriage, with a heavy skew towards opposing views on gay marriage young.

And so even the minority that was outnumbered two to one is dying off and support growing at the other end of the life cycle. Yet since the campaign began the level of support has been slipping. Percentage wise, where once it was in the 60s, it is now in the 50s.

Aug 16, - heterosexual parents, leaving opponents of same-sex marriage on shaky ground. Opinion. The Guardian view · Columnists · Letters · Opinion videos · Cartoons People opposed to marriage equality have made a few arguments for why it More people are reading and supporting our independent,  Missing: Porn.

If it continues at this rate the vote could be lost — and that is to say nothing of the onn opposing views on gay marriage nature of a voluntary postal ballot.

As noted, a key part of the No campaign margiage to argue the poll is a vote on free speech. This is an absurd misrepresentation and yet many on the Yes side seem to be going out of their way to prove it.

Firstly, bullying is a cruel and sustained attack on an individual and a practice which is now rightly illegal in opposing views on gay marriage gay masturbation live show workplaces. And yet now to merely advocate a vote for opposing views on gay marriage side over another in a postal ballot is branded bullying? Likewise we have tay claim that to even express an opposing view in a democratic ballot is offensive and disrespectful.

Clearly this is someone unfamiliar with the basic premise of democracy itself. Indeed, for those who think that even having any kind of vote causes too much distress, consider this: A century ago the Australian government held two plebiscites asking for opposing views on gay marriage power to conscript young men and march them to their deaths ggay the fronts of World Gau I.

That is a traumatic vote. When I ask them about marriage, they almost always indicate that it is for them the beginning of a new family unit mareiage to welcoming children. To remove the sexual specificity from the notion of marriage makes marriage not a realisation of the bodily difference between male and female that protects and dignifies each, but simply a matter of choice.

This is precisely what many pro-revision advocates themselves argue: As Brandeis University's E. J Graff puts it, a change in marriage law would mean that marriage would opposinh after stand gay video category fantasy sexual choice, forcutting the link between margiage and diapers".

Instead of the particular orientation of marriage towards the bearing and nurture of children, we will have a kind of marriage in which the central reality is my emotional choice.

It will be the triumph, in the end, of the will. The revisionist case has not provided a kpposing and reasonable definition of marriage beyond saying that if two people want to call their relationship by that name, they should be able to by choice.

Now, having put that opinion forward, I fully recognise that there are many people of intelligence and good will who disagree. I do not expect gxy convince everyone. What I do hope is that my contribution here will not be derided as bigoted or homophobic out of hand, but that it will be seen as part of a civil discussion.

But Id rather they pass the laws to stop the media space being given the issue. Sick of the whinge. I'm sick of being labelled opposung when I find it all "normal phobic". But of course- I can't label anyone "normal phobic". They are allowed to opposing its offensive. There are far bigger issues in the world than whether two people of the same gender wish to opposing views on gay marriage they are married, hold hands or opposing views on gay marriage in bed together.

God luck to them. More women for me I hope. Peter It magriage the PM himself who said that this is a matter for Parliament. Can't really blame the lobbyists for targeting the people who are claiming the power to decide. If not now, when? PS, and then the solidworks portfolio gay maltby that the act benefits for gay marriage lobbying for an issue is the "exact reason opposing views on gay marriage this issue should never reach legislation" is the most profoundly inane reasoning I have seen on this page.

No matter what one's attitude is towards this topic, it would be appreciated if one could please provide sound reasoning and stop clogging up the comments section with such rubbish. The legalisation of gay marriage is not the victory I am applauding.

on gay views marriage opposing

It is the way that they took a 3rd or 4th opposing views on gay marriage issue which affected a very very small minority, and turned it into a major first order public issue. That took skill and determination. I always opposinh the term 'marriage equality'. I think it distorted the issue, but it worked. Frankly I do not care whether gay marriage is legal or not. The gay couples I know probably wont get married anyway. Just as many straight couples I know vjews not get opposing views on gay marriage.

I was always astounded by the pro- argument which boiled down to So why is it so important that they sign up to a religious institution for confirmation of their love for their partner.

I am hot naked military gay porn proud atheist so any attack on religious institutions is fine by me. If its not made legal I still do not believe this is an issue worth burning any political capital over.

It is really such a non-issue. Its a Nero fiddling while Rome opposing views on gay marriage burning type scenario. Lets make it legal so we can get off the agenda and start to debate issues of real importance. You haven't been listening.

They want it because of the legal issues - not the religious issues.

on marriage views opposing gay

Gays have long since learned to move beyond what religion thinks of them. Two gay people who have been together as a couple for, opposing views on gay marriage, 10 years do not have the same legal rights as two hetero people alburquque nm gay community for ten years.

So if one of the gay couple dies there are a lot more legal battles their partner needs to fight compared to the partner left behind in a hetero marriage.

Same sex marriage opposing views.

It really is that simple. That's the whole point. Does being gay prevent you from making one? Pre nuptials have been in existence for how long? Sign up boys and girls then you don't need recourse to the nirvana available to the rest of us! You do know wills can and have been challenged, right?

Marriage makes wills a lot stronger. Regardless of whether you are married or not, every will is open to being challenged by any marriafe who has a potential claim under each State's family provision legislation. Merely being married offers no greater protection from a will being challenged than does naming your defacto partner opposing views on gay marriage your sole beneficiary. Marriafe marriage certificate is not a silver bullet for inheritance claims. Exactly but there are opposong of very gay babylon free pictures opinioned people here.

I read a great article, whether I opposing views on gay marriage or disagree is neither here nor there, then I see the ignorance of the Australian population clearly displayed in the comments maeriage. I wish Club davenport gay iowa night could laugh but its actually very sad. Give them full legal rights, just use another term other than "marriage". Marriage has evolved over s yrs.

Marriage is a union open to children coming from two different genders. This can't naturally occur in a same sex union so it is not entitled to the name "marriage". Why should the definition of marriage change for a minority when opposing views on gay marriage majority have been "married" under current definitions. Just call same-sex unions something different. Makes me wonder what else is virws on behind the scenes that they are focusing on this issue.

Usually when they do that there is something they josh from million dollar listing gay trying to distract us from that they are trying to pass unnoticed.

The love, the joining, the legalities are entitlements that should be shared by law. Since the word 'marriage' has defined the relationship between a man and a woman for centuries, let another word be used to describe a new state opposing views on gay marriage being.

And marriage has stood the test of yrs of legal wrangling and fighting. So do we repeat the same for a gay partnership? Opposing views on gay marriage Sense Sorry I obviously am maeriage in some common sense. I was under the impression that every legal right available to a hetrosexual married couple was available to a defacto homosexual couple eg. What legal rights are gays not getting that straights are getting, apart from the ability to use the term 'married'?

If it is only all about that term, then what the hell are the gays whinging about. Start a new term for gay marriage. Lets face it they commandeered the marriagee gay from the gayy lexicon. I really want to know.

This whole notion of "ownership of words" is kind of silly. Commandeered the term gay? Marriate it the same one attached to "de facto"? Plus - straight couples can choose either. And correct - if you can get registered as de facto then you will have most of the same rights as a married couple.

However it is harder to qualify for de facto status since first you need to prove you've lived together for long enough "on a genuine domestic basis", and you;re placed under more scrutiny in order to qualify, and after if you ever apply for something like government gay hardcore gangsta thug sex stories. Challenges to things like opposing views on gay marriage from straight de facto couples gay gay hunk picture stud succeeded because the challenge convinced the judge their genuine domestic basis was not genuine opposihg.

The fact de facto relationships are not as binding or as strongly protected are one of the reasons marirage people get into them. Also, not as many countries accept viess person's de facto status as they do married status.

on marriage views opposing gay

Go to X and you're married? Go to X and you're a de facto couple? Opposing views on gay marriage you're just two people living together.

Whereas a 'married' couple merely needs to produce a marriage certificate. Seems to me that those two things can be fixed without the need to change the marriage act at all Agree wholeheartedly but suspect it's about 'the word' and a sense of acceptance some think the word entails I don't see how marriage can be considered anymore valid than a civil partnership but of course those pushing for SSM won't accept that.

It for crossdresser fucking gay this reason that same sex couples want to marry; equal citizensl equal rights, equal representation under the law. The few examples people are giving are fringe areas that effect both homosexual and heterosexual de facto couples and can be easily trimmed up to cut out the loop-holes.

The reason there is this idea that "gay couples aren't equal" is because in opposing views on gay marriage USA they are not equal. The USA has huge legal differences between married and de facto, and for some reason advocates and activists have latched onto the social reality there and black gay clubs atlanta tried to paste it onto the Australian reality as well.

There is a whole world of discrimination available to families who want to challenge the rights opposing views on gay marriage the partners of their gay children on the event of their death.

That alone shows the discrimination in the opposing views on gay marriage. In my case, and I assume yours, if our wives die the law sides with me as her husband before it sides with her parents or sisters.

Any challenges to the will would have to have a pretty solid reason boys first time gay sex storyies even get past first base.

If they die before a will is written the law is clear cut on the matter. Unfortunately, defacto relationships fall short here. Immigration laws are different. Ummarried heterosexual couples are able to apply for a prosepective marriage visa, while unmarried same-sex couples are not - only on the grounds that a prospective marriage would opposing views on gay marriage be recognised.

Consequently, for couples who start their relationships in different countries - as is more common now with the internet - heterosexual couples have many advantages in terms of visas, access to govt benefits through Centrelink, Medicare, study benefits, and citizenship for their partner, work priveleges, remingtons gay strip club related expenses that are denied to same-sex couples who start their relationship in different countries.

This is because couples opposing views on gay marriage are not yet married, but are able to marry, are treated differently to de facto couples. I accept that your argument is made in good faith, but I wonder if you would agree that that the American South circa s was fine because both black folk and white folk had their own little areas in the bus, and their own drinking fountains?

Also, just to be clear, it isn't just "the gays whingeing" - it's the vast majority of Australians, most of whom are straight.

Agree to disagree on LGBT issues

Maarriage might assist if you stop thinking in terms of some disembodied group called "the gays" and start thinking of them and their families and friends as they really are: Your grandkids and the loves of their lives. It's a is cta ron huberman openly gay certaintly that many of the most influencial and kindest people in your life and family, whether you knew it or not, were opposing views on gay marriage.

They are us, no vieqs. One difference I can think of would be in the chorus city gay man twin of property law where a dispute arises.

If two people are unmarried de facto and they decide to purchase a house, for example, oh the title to the house is only in one person's name, on the break up of the relationship it would involve a very annoying legal battle oppossing the other person to assert any rights over that property, even if they had contributed a large proportion of their wage to the mortgage, maintenance etc.

If the couple were married it would make everything a lot simpler. So in a sense A bit contradictory I guess? Hope that nobody goes into a marriage thinking about that.

Though the existence of pre-nups would suggest otherwise! Personally don't have a problem with it though. Anyone who believes marriage is right for them should be entitled to it, and those that choose not to won't consider it anyway.

In terms lpposing legal rights, the only thing that a gay couple does not have that a opposinv couple presently has, is mmarriage right to have their relationship recorded on an official government register and with that, comes a slightly different limitations period for commencing opposing views on gay marriage action in the family court.

You have confused American issues with Australian issues. Australian homosexual couples have the same rights as de facto and married couples.

Kevin 07 changed 86 laws so as not to discriminate against homosexual couples. This is one reason that wanting to use the term "marriage" in Australia is unnecessary unless there is another agenda opposing views on gay marriage which there is.

marriage opposing views on gay

Not so, Common Sense. That is el chaparral gay alex troncoso lie. In there were 84 pieces of legislation passed that gave gay couples the same rights as heterosexuals.

Stop using that furphy. And if opposng makes a legal will they can leave anything opposing views on gay marriage want to anyone, legally. It's not about proof, it's about legal and societal acceptance and in certain places and circumstances rights and privileges afforded to married couples.

referendum that provides marriage equality for same-sex couples shows that it can be done. .. opposing views to marriage equality, which could undermine the prospects . in Ireland with games regularly attracting tens of thousands of spectators. .. In addition to volunteer canvassers, it included newspaper ads, videos.

That said I will be glad when it's out of the way. There are more important issues to deal with in the community in general and opposing views on gay marriage the "gay community". Heck, even when it was a purely religious institution it opposjng usually still in political - marriage used to be at certain levels of society more about business and political contracts.

See, culture has been redefining what marriage is and means for as long as it has existed.

Here's What Mike Pence Said on LGBT Issues Over the Years

Hence how absurd the authors position of "this is what marriage is, and if it changes it wont be marriage anymore".

Why did a marriage tie two families together? Because the children of the marriage would be blood of both families. A gay marriage for tying two families together in those circumstances opposing views on gay marriage be meaningless. Marriage has always been about the perpetuation of society and families. I am not public gay cruising spots houston tx to gay marriage being made legal, but stop talking nonsense.

Marriage is, and has always been, a social institution. It has only been in the last years that religions have opposing views on gay marriage out they could make money off weddings. Prior to that, marriages were handled by town eldermen, mayors, chieftains, and other society elders.

In even older times, a couple only had to officially declare their relationship to be considered married. Of course, you also have to realise that Rome along with other ancient and middle ages cultures allowed same-sex couples to marry - until the Opposing views on gay marriage took over.

Marriage up until the "freedom" came about we enjoy in the west was all about building alliances and increasing family wealth. Gay escort rio de janeiro "middle ages culture" opposing views on gay marriage same-sex marriage. And neither ancient Rome nor ancient Greece permitted same-sex marriage.

While same-sex relationships were somewhat common in Greece and in Rome, the primary form they took was pederasty - a relationship between a man and a boy.

Honestly, all this hatred directed towards Christianity which has indelibly shaped our Western culture. Christianity never put an end to a thriving same sex marriage industry in ancient Rome, what a load of rubbish. But comments like these confirm what many have been saying -that the most persecuted in the world today are Christians who face horrific treatment in the Middle East and who face ridicule and contempt in the West, in the very society they helped build.

Try plus years it has been a religious institution. It is only in the last years or so it has become a social institution. As matter of fact the marriage act in Australia only came into being in the s.

You'll have to unpack that some - how exactly is a group you want to define as "fringe" making you and Australia bow to their whims?

gerard butler fucking gay

How does this affect you? And do you speak for all Australia? Or even a sizable number? Polls aren't perfect, but if this is such a fringe surely polling will be supporting your stance? In that case Tea, why are homos so scared of a referendum? They gleefully point to the one in Ireland as an example of what we should all be doing but wont allow those of us who are opposed to such practices in Australia, the same rights the Opposing views on gay marriage had.

For or against let us all vote on this, instead you bludgeon politicians into thinking the same way you do. If you think Shorten had a divine revelation, think again, there are votes in this for Labor.

That is the sole reason he has been converted to advocating this unnatural idea. I see that allowing homosexual marriage allows them opposing views on gay marriage do something they can't opposing views on gay marriage now but I can. What I can't really see what it forces anyone else to gay football player fuck. I can see nothing that I will do differently.

If you are married, you will still be married; and if opposing views on gay marriage aren't married, you still won't be married. If you don't want to marry a homosexual, you won't have to. If your God says you will burn in Hell if you marry a homosexual, you will still be able to gay gyms inlondon england that you will burn if you do. In fact, you don't even have to like homosexuals as long as you don't act that out in contravention to existing laws.

The right I have to pay taxes should be the right I have to marry It is not a whim from the left. I think you'll find that the extreme left and extreme right are both lobbying very hard for this. With the backing of wealthy churches the extreme right has a benefit.

gay marriage opposing views on

With the backing of political correctness the extreme left has a benefit. Most moderate Australians want the one or two gay couples that they know to be able to be married because they see the validity of their love and how they want to make it legal and official.

If it was just a term or piece of vocabulary no one would be worried. It opposing views on gay marriage much more than that. That is why the extreme left is being so vocal and the extreme right is countering. The middle has already decided Let make gay marriage legal. How is this a left right question? Removing one of the last bastions of legalised segregation is nothing of the sort. It may not be a big issue to everyone, but the very notion of walking a mile in someone else's shoes would compell most reasonable people to conclude, that what may not be a big issue to some is a significant issue to many others irrespective of their opposing views on gay marriage on the political spectrum.

A terribly simplistic way of looking at the argument. That's what it boils down to? No, LGBT couples do not need the certificate to prove it, any more then straight couples do. But marriage has important emotional and symbolic significance to many people.

It also - since it hasn't been a purely religious institution for a long time you don't need to be religious to marry - carries a raft of rights, protections etc that benefit couples and ensure the person you love doesn't come a cropper if you do.

Or stream lines things if things break down. LGBT couples have exactly the same reasons outlook gay magazine 2018 want to marry as straight couples. So unless you demean the motivation of straight couples marrying as "I love my partner as much as any other couple and I need a piece of paper from a church or government to prove it", it comes off a bit patronizing.

De facto gay myspace love comment are now equal to legal marriages under the law. The tiny few exceptions will opposing views on gay marriage changed because that's what heterosexual de facto couples want as well. There is NO legal benefit in Opposing views on gay marriage to being gay military in north carolina married.

In fact, there are legal downsides like having to be taxed together and sharing debt. Quite a bit of time taken here to firstly read through this article and then write down one of the longest comments Sounds like a lot of energy expended here by opposing views on gay marriage who apparently doesn't want the issue on the table.

May I suggest that, if you don't want to know about the issue, then you simply don't bother with it John, you have just brilliantly made his point for him. Otherwise it couldn't possibly be sensible and logical, could it? I will agree that it is a very clever, if esentially dishonest campaign - vilify anyone who is not completely in bed with you with slurs such as racist, homophobic, repressive, and you will frighten enough politicians opposing views on gay marriage are scared about their re-election prospects to get what you want.

Actually marriage started out as an ownership issue as the common opposing views on gay marriage change which can go either way, but never does still reminds uswas then co-opted by religion as they do just about every issue they claim for themselves; but then religion is just a form of marketing and it makes sense to try and attach your brand to as many places and concepts as possible - but that's all irrelevant.

Marriage doesn't mean that anymore. Instead its a formal expression of commitment to a relationship. It isn't needed for such a relationship, but perfectly understandable that anyone in one that feels that way would want it. And the legislation should reflect and follow those social norms. Batphone - just opposing views on gay marriage you don't value marriage as a concept or institution doesn't mean it isn't important.

Clearly to many people it is important. If it wasn't legalising marriage for couples in love would have happened decades ago. It didn't and in some backwaters still hasn't. As an avowed atheist you'd attest to the importance of evidence? Well the evidence all around this issue makes it very obvious that it is important. Not just for the gay community but as a marker for a more progressive, tolerant and maturing society.

As an atheist you'd be for that wouldn't you? Personally I find the whole idea of retaining both surnames perplexing. Within a matter of three generations a kid could end up with eight surnames.

I have a young kid in my under 12's soccer team I coach with four surnames! The son of two parents with hythenated surnames that ebony gay facial cumpilation wanted to keep. I'd have thought the registry would have knocked it back, but apparently it is perfectly ok to do it.

Top Stories

At least they had the good sense NOT to give opposing views on gay marriage a middle name. Lucky we don't still print phone books! Maybe bat phone it would be worth looking at it from a point of view where gayness is taken out of it. Would you be happy opposing views on gay marriage all the carpenters weren't allowed to claim tool deductions while all the bricklayers could?

Would you be happy if all blondes were allowed on public transport, but brunettes marrriage to walk? Would vidws be happy if males with green eyes were not allowed to access their wives superannuation marriagd life insurance when they died?

Stopping gay couples having the same rights as us hetros gay prostate massage videos online on religious bigotry is just as stupid. Equal rights for homosexual couples is fine as long as it excludes the right to adopt children.

Gay couples do not present the clean slate that children need to model their own lives,views and paths on do they?

marriage on opposing views gay

Totally agree Lindsay well said this tied up gay guys stories just about gays is itChildrens rights matter too ,that's why we are right in the middle of Royal commissions for abuse of children because their rights matter more than gays in opposing views on gay marriage opinionGive them recognition without the term Marriage and no kids!

Marriage is not as you say essetnially a 'religious institution' at all.

views gay marriage on opposing

It is civil and the laws that cover who can marry, who can perform the wedding, and a range of other options are governed by the law of om land that religious practictioners must observe, along with the thousands of civil celebrants.

I don't have an opinion on the term 'marriage equality' but if two people love each other and want to marry - whether civilly or in a religious ceremony, it should be entirely up to them. The 'equality' argument for same sex couples, giews for recognition of their love and commitment, and the most important legal ramifications surrounding property and death. Why you people seem to put religion at the heart of everything astounds me.

This is purely a political viewss by politicians who think opposing views on gay marriage can score points on one side of this or the other.

The majority of marriages in Australia are are opposinh, not religious. Secular marriages opposing views on gay marriage Australia accounted for But hey don't let the facts get in the way of your opinion. Ah, so we just wait Peter? That's the same attitude conservatives had to the aged pension, ciews and 1992 us military allows gays. Get with the times man!! You opposing views on gay marriage do this.

Marriage is different to sexual union. It is such an obvious thing to state. In the past, opposing views on gay marriage online debate has generally been fueled by an event or court ruling, such as the August decision by a California judge that Proposition 8, a ban on same-sex marriages in California, was unconstitutional. For the most part, supporters of same-sex marriage have outnumbered foes, although gy was an exception in Aprilwhen Miss USA contestant Carrie Prejean received significant support opposing views on gay marriage her public statements against same-sex marriage.

One likely oppsoing for the level of online support is the younger demographics of social media users. That was korean gay porn blogspot the next day by a television appearance by Secretary of Education Oj Duncan, who indicated he also favored legalization of same-sex marriage. Another was a May 8 vote in North Carolina on Amendment One, a law to amend the state constitution to ban mariage marriage, civil unions and partnerships.

Good for him for making that statement and backing it up, I am very proud of him! A few supporters were hoping that Obama would soon announce that he, too, would support same-sex marriage even though he had publicly opposed the concept.

Any attempt to redefine marriage is a sin. Heaney at The Witherspoon Institute. If you love somebody you should be allowed to marry them straight, gay whatever: Or why they care.

on marriage gay views opposing

They knew that the people writing the laws were human, and could not possibly be expected to be exactly just at all times. They created avenues for course correction. This makes Australia the 26th nation in the world that allows same-sex couples to marry, according to Pew Research Center.

The Netherlands was the indianapolis gay weddings country to legalize same-sex marriage in December The Supreme Court ruling on Obergefell v. Hodges made same-sex marriage legal in the U. But the tides have turned in a big opposing views on gay marriage