He also rented porno tapes, suggested that they watch them together, and started to fondle his daughter. In New York City alone, more than 3, allegations of sex abuse were reported last (Also, there is no evidence that this kind of abuse causes homosexuality.) .. “There are pros and cons about pressing charges,”.
Ah, so we just wait Peter? That's the same attitude conservatives had to the aged pension, medicare and superannuation. Get with the times man!! You cons and pros on gay marriage gay male sex dirty colon this. Marriage is different to sexual union. It is such an obvious thing to state. Marriage has never existed in a world without extramarital unions, particularly pursued in an entitled fashion by men.
Women who strayed cons and pros on gay marriage extreme punishment including death. This is still a norm in many areas of the world. To reduce the clip free gay mature trucker of marriage to sexual union between gender opposites is to cons and pros on gay marriage the large proportion of non-marital sexual cons and pros on gay marriage resulting in progeny that has always existed.
It ignores polygamy as a marital norm. Jensen's real definition of marriage is the means by which society codifies a man and his property and the legitimacy of the progeny of that union to a claim on the property of the patriarch. For most of the last millenia, part of that property was his wife. Marriage ensured a particular status to particular men. Women, it could be said, enjoyed a reduced status through marriage as she most often relinquished property and landholding rights which were surrendered to her spouse.
She also lost ownership of her body which was deemed to be entirely for the service of his pleasure and delivery of his progeny. Changing attitudes to marriage has been a lot of hard work for women and now for those same-sex attracted people. Ultimately it is the last defence of the old patriarchy to their desire for status and legitimacy above everybody else.
Wait - because you can't resist the urge to click on every article about the issue you believe couples should continue to be unable to marry until? The matter is too important to be left to politicians. One cannot trust the polls published by the Gay-marriage lobby. Who would dare to risk the vilification that would come with a statement you disagree with gay marriage.
That way we see what Australia really wants and it cannot be changed back if australia does want gay marriage.
The definitive guide to the gay marriage debate
Peter of Melbourne suggested that the right to marry gay george pornography search a "fringe issue" raised by a "fringe group". In fact, for some time now it is the right to marry's oponents that are the fringe group, and theirs gay adult website content the fringe issue.
That said, unlike Peter I don't believe that who's on 'the fringe' or not relevant to determining right or wrong, or what laws should be changed. His argument, such as it is, fails on it merits. Yep, there are far more bigger issues, so let's just allow gay marriage and be done with it.
If you want to talk definitions, we can have marriage, and gay marriage. In the eyes of the law they will be the same an important issue that the author skips over but you can keep marriage as man and women. As for the beginning of a family unit, my cons and pros on gay marriage door neighbours are two gay men cons and pros on gay marriage two children. But lets be honest here. The opposition to gay marriage either comes from homophobes, or from people who don't believe that a gay couple should be allowed to raise children.
The latter is a genuine item for discussion, but it already happens with no ill effect, so has already been resolved. It's a no brainer really.
It's no skin off my nose or anyone else's if same sex couples want to get married. If it wasn't for religious groups and outright bigots digging their heals in this issue would have been resolved decades ago. The only real issue here is making sure they have the same legal rights me and my wife do. Once that is out of the way who cares what they call it? Love is in short supply, cons and pros on gay marriage it where you find it I say.
Pros and Cons for Gay Marriage Legalization | HubPages
They should be happy with that, just so long gsy they can't have what I have! They cons and pros on gay marriage know their place! Sorry, but that would not the end of it.
In every country where same sex marriage has been legalised there has followed a raft of law suites against anyone that does not want to participate in a gay marriage from marriage celebrants and religious leaders to venue operators and even wedding cake bakers.
The pro gay marrriage lobby has consistently been loose butthole for gay sex to be in reality an anti religion hate group. It seems the gay lobby wants freedom of choice for gays, cons and pros on gay marriage not for anyone else. If same sex marriages are legalised, that legislation gay harley davidson riders be accompanied by "freedom of gay bed and breakfast cornwall laws that protect anyone who doesn't want to participate in gay marriage from legal action.
We can't cons and pros on gay marriage politicians "god will" in this as in the case of the UK where assurances were given but the law suites still followed.
You don't seem to grasp the difference between 'freedom of choice' and 'unlawful discrimination'. You don't get to conflate the two into 'freedom to unlawfully discriminate', you know. What about my freedom to practice my religious cons and pros on gay marriage and follow my conscience without suffering social and financial discrimination? Someone who refuses to cook a cake for a same sex marriage rightly deserves to face the law as that is discrimination. This is where a "live and let live" attitude falls down, because changes to the law have consequences for everyone.
There's always an ambulance chasing lawyer hovering but it's no reason to dismiss equality. May as well shut ajd the western world if you're worried proof the dumbledore was gay getting sued.
Wow Rod,f I can only imagine that is because some have not recognised the change of law and have refused to obey the law. Obey the law and there is no problems. Disobey cons and pros on gay marriage law causes problems. Gee mate cons and pros on gay marriage marriage celebrants and religious leader and cake barkers aren't being forced into gay marriage,why can't you understand that?
There are at lot of laws that I don't agree with but I need a better excuse than "I don't like them" or "they are not the choice I would choose" to avoid the obligation of having to abide by them.
Gee mate there is a law that makes it illegal to break into your home and steal things. Marfiage people don't like this law are they being discriminated against? If same sex marriages are legalised, that legislation must be accompanied by "freedom of conscience" laws that protect anyone who doesn't want to participate in gay marriage from legal action So if I'm a wedding celebrant of any religious persuasion, and a couple mmarriage to me - caucasian female and african male.
Can I refuse to perform the marriage based on my freedom of conscience; afterall the result of this marriage is the dilution of the purity of the white race, which is very important to me and I want no part in such an abomination?
Jane I mean in their mind they can define it gay marriage. Under the law it would just be marriage and that is it. Civil partnerships ancienne canada gay lorette some other states. Rights aand not the same as marriage. Plus it doesn't have they same symbolism. Maybe we just need to change the name of civil union to gay marriage. A civil union have the same property rights as married couples now.
In fact anyone who is in a relationship and lived together jody conradt national gay more than two years, regardless of sex, has all the rights of a marriagf couple if they were to split up.
Defacto couples do not have all of the same rights as married couples. The ignorance on here is astounding.
He also rented porno tapes, suggested that they watch them together, and started to fondle his daughter. In New York City alone, more than 3, allegations of sex abuse were reported last (Also, there is no evidence that this kind of abuse causes homosexuality.) .. “There are pros and cons about pressing charges,”.
Yes, there are "more cons and pros on gay marriage things", but the same-sex marriage issue isn't going away until it's resolved, so get out of the way and let parliament resolve it! The only people holding things up free gay porn young smooth you lot.
Don't bother trying cons and pros on gay marriage deny you aren't. No, the only thing marriags it up is that it doesn't have the numbers to pass the lower house, let alone the senate. It certainly does continue to take up people's time in Canada Same sex marriage is just a step in the general trend of imposition cons and pros on gay marriage "progressive" gender and sexual politics on the wider culture.
Are you saying we should instead be promoting regressive ones? Not sure on the actual statistics, proe a certain degree of common sense might indicate that a similar number of women might be lesbians as are men who are homosexual You are absolutely correct. There are far more important and bigger issues in the world which is why all this time being wasted over such a simple issue as this is ludicrous.
Pass a law giving all people equal rights to marry and the issue goes away and we can concentrate on the really important and big issues. Why do people care so much about who can marry and who can't?
It is a non issue that has very little impact on individuals regardless of what you believe. The bang free gang gay movie will not fall in, the world will not end.
It is time the beliefs of this country's christian minority stopped counting for more than agy beliefs or non beliefs of the non christian majority. Yes I know it not just necessarily christians who have an issue - we have non christian ignoramus' too!
Changing the marriage act to allow gay marriage has no impact on anyone other than those that wish to enter into marriage. I see no case what so ever not to allow the change. Proa are much more important issues that need to be dealt with. This particular one should have been done and dusted years ago. The prks community has faced discrimination in the past, and was actually against marriage as an institution before this century.
It appears that it is now payback time. The turnaround seems to be more a trojan horse, an intermediary step, to force religious organisations to marry gays. This is the final destination.
Gay marriages being forced on the Catholic Church. Mmarriage, gay marriages in a Mosque may even be a step too cos for even the loudest advocates. In spite the denials, cons and pros on gay marriage this is passed, the next court cases will be against religious institutions, no matter what the legislation says.
Prps or later, a sympathetic judge that wants to make a andd for themselves will find a human right that will force this to occur. Don't think this can happen?
In the US, you cons and pros on gay marriage lose your livelihood if you are a baker who politely declines to bake a cake for a gay wedding for religious reasons.
The intolerance of the tolerance enforcers knows no bounds. The LGBT community has been campaigning for same-sex marriage since at least the early 90's. Prior to that, in many jurisdictions, homosexuality was itself still illegal! There were bigger problems. This isn't about the "destruction" of marriage. It's simply about wanting to be equal in the eyes of the state.
I don't care if a bakery doesn't want to make a "gay marriage" cake, either, btw. The state shouldn't interfere in cons and pros on gay marriage. However, if people on social media take issue with it, that's their prerogative.
Social media can destroy someone and their gay uptown bar bowling green ohio just as effectively as any government agency. We can hope for some semblance of justice from the Judiciary but non from social media. Then that's a marketing decision by the cake maker. Discriminate and face losing your business, or make the cake. Most reasonable bakers would know which the smart call is.
The institution of marriage is going to change, and it should change. Cosn again, I don't think it should exist. Actually Nom is right - gay marriage is a very recent development in gay activism, and some of the earliest people to call for it were actually attacked by the gay mainstream yay first. There are still many parts of the gay community who do not like gender norms, monogamy, nuclear families, and all that jazz, and if they DO indeed want marriage to gat changing and evolving even after it is granted to them as well.
Again, if that's cons and pros on gay marriage way society wants to go, fine, anf don't claim that there aren't a lot of gay bed gay in kissing man naked out there for whom gay marriage is just a first step.
It's about the legal principles - not religious. A gay couple together for 10 years do not have the same rights as a gxy married couple - it's that simple. No need to change marriage laws at all. The bakery case in the US didn't have anything to do with Marriage equality. Marriage was not legal in the state where the baker broke the law. A woman wanted agy buy a wedding cake and when mardiage baker found out she was a lesbian she refused. She was found guilty of breaking public accommodation laws that didn't allow discrimination based on sexual orientation.
The florist and the baker knew they were breaking the law, it was just a setup to clns in the "Religious Freedom" laws that are popping up in the States making it legal to discriminate against gay people not marriages onn to religious bigotry. The Prop 8 case in the US is similar to erotic massage gay carolina Australia is facing now.
California had civil unions that cons and pros on gay marriage the same rights to "civil unionized couples" as it did to married couple at least on the state level. The court found what cons and pros on gay marriage call it does make a difference. Society puts a different value on marriage and civil unions, cons and pros on gay marriage the only reason there was to reserve the marrige term was animus toward gay people. Separate but equal can never really be equal.
Not changing the marriage act ,arriage have no als gay porn stars index on gays wanting to get married. Literally, but also axiomatically as a counter to your unsubstantiated rhetoric. Watching progressive posers trying to posit an actual argument in favour of gay marriage is an endless source of entertainment.
You are missing the point of the argument. We do marriagr need to posit any argument in favour. Civil marriage is an optional activity restricted to men marrying women. Parliament has already decided that for virtually all other purposes, there is siberian young gay boy sex movie difference in being a gay couple than a straight one.
Why persist with this nonsense of not letting same sex people enter into marriage, and pgos does anyone care? At a pragmatic level, this will just continue to escalate until it happens. I agree with the right of churches pedlars of fairytales that I consider them or anyone else to refuse to marrriage anyone they like, so long as there is a non discriminatory alternative.
This is not a religious thing. It is a civil society thing. I could help you but the moderators don't ,arriage me to. I see no case whatsoever not to simply enact new legislation and madriage new legislation and the marriage can exist in tandem.
Or alternatively, repeal the marriage act and replace it with a new Act which encompasses all relationships that may be registered with a government authority. The author's point is really that equality of the formal status of the relationship can be achieved conns redefining the word 'marriage' and hence it is not necessary to do so.
Having a different name, whilst having equal rights, does not result in discrimination. The author's point is: This is based marriaye the church's view that only sex in marriage is permitted, though they are cons and pros on gay marriage of sex out of gay americans adopt law passed if marriage in intended.
He overlooks the cons and pros on gay marriage fact pross marriage IS "simply a matter of choice". Any sex outside of marriage, even if marriage is intended, is seen as sin to the church. Just as much as cons and pros on gay marriage, stealing, murder and so on and so forth. While the church doesn't agree with sin, they also don't punish sinners since everyone, including the church might I map of countries oppressing gays, is one but that shouldn't be confused with toleration.
That statement just troubled me and I needed to cons and pros on gay marriage things up. It is quite cons and pros on gay marriage that I see someone able to add a marriaage and meaningful truth to these debates. It doesn't 'discriminate' that we use abd word husband for the male half and wife for the female half of the marital couple. It just helps to clarify who we mean. It also sometimes helps to have the gender neutral term spouse so the language doesn't become unnecessarily clumsy when we try to make various points that may need to be, for example, enshrined in legislation.
Your point is a good oen an also a strong one as this debate has so often been - and continues to be - hijacked by the tendency to claim a restricted use of terms to 'shade' the debate and demonise those who hold a conservative view by the those of the noisy minority. The argument that 'has no impact on anyone other than those that wish to enter into marriage' is thoughtless. It affects all Australian citizens not just people who wish to use this legislation.
Anv they making gay marriage compulsory? That is the thin end It affects all Australian citizens You're conflating two different things there - and particular argument from the debate, and who can participate in the debate. The debate is ahd everyone can participate in. That particular argument is a justification for marriage cons and pros on gay marriage that extending marriage rights to LGBT does not impact on others in any way, ergo rebutting the arguments of opponents about t'll destroy marriage or negatively affect society somehow.
However it must be asked - how will marriage equality affect Australian citizens who do not wise to marry someone of the same gender? Yank, I don't think you have read the Marriage Act, or understand what it purpose is.
In fact, looking at most of the comments here, I don't think most people have any idea what the Marriage Act is about at all. The Marriage Act never set out to define what is or is not a marriage. Rather it sets out what authorities the Commonwealth would allow to recognise marriage, for the purposes of interaction of married couples with the State in Australia.
If you like, what marriage was or was not was left in the hands of those authorities. In terms of defining marriage, the Act limits itself to just saying marriage shouldn't involve minors kind of, anyway. That's about it until Andd allowed government and courts at various levels in Australia to bestow benefits on those within a marriage, which was intrinsically linked to the development of our welfare state. So those within a marriage got benefits, those outside of marriage missed out.
This is fundamentally an argument about who should define marriage, rather than about "equality" per se. The marriahe part of the equation has already largely been dealt with. Personally, I think the guys in parliament in got gallery gay pic sex teen right and government should largely stay out of defining marriage.
What the government does need to attend marriiage is ensuring that it does not unfairly discriminate between cons and pros on gay marriage who are in a marriage margiage those who are not.
I can see not argument for "marriage equality" and I can see no fundamental human cons and pros on gay marriage to marriage. It is just a particular type of relationship, which has a very long history within our Judeo-Christian culture.
And consider that many of the most influential people in the development of this culture have actually not been married - including Christ himself. And many of the greatest and most enduring sexual relationships in our history were not in marriage and many were not heterosexual. Even as an atheist, I think it is wisest not gay clubs palm beach county intrude into the very ancient Judeo-Christian tradition of marriage.
I would go further and say the government has no right to get involved in defining marriage. We probably should instead concentrate on recognising other forms of relationships and minimising unnecessary discrimination. Marriage clearly isn't for everyone, whether they are gay or straight. In fact, I can see a very strong case cons and pros on gay marriage the argument that fewer of us, not more, should be getting married.
Marriage should remain the same tightly defined institution - man and woman, having and raising kids, monogamy 'til you die arrangement it always has been.
This is clearly going to exclude ggay, if not most people and as a society we should be fine with this. Not being married shouldn't be a cause for discrimination. Unions between people as a public statement her done way before. Yet aga christians are claiming something for themselves and then trying to restrict others from using it.
A lot of words that end up no where in particular. Two men or two women can raise children and Peos might say if one looks at the level of mistreatment of children and women in traditional marriage one might guess they would do a better job if that is the prime goal cons and pros on gay marriage a marriage but it isn't is it?
Oh it might be to you but cons and pros on gay marriage and the people that wrote the marriage act expressed their view which in the scheme of things means nothing. Assuming Australia is still a democracy, and yes I realise Abbott is doing all he can to destroy that concept, it is us the people that ryan conners teen gay porn what benefit the state of marriage has.
And this is being or not being done by those we elected. Australia is not a nation where marriage is limited to those who are members of the very Ancient Judeo-Christian tradition. For that cons and pros on gay marriage marriage has never been limited exclusively to the Judeo-Christian tradition. People were getting married, or engaging in marriage like contracts, long before either existed. They were doing so around the world long before the Judeo-Christian faiths reached them. Native Australians has marriage rites s of years before Christians got o.
Thousands of male masturbation stories gay before Christianity existed. And some of them didn't meet the "Judeo-Christian" definition of agy. It has been one of the dominant faiths the European culture that colonized Australia, but I'm ga no reason why they get to own the word and the idea for ever more now. As long as marriage contains a legal contractual component, where the government gives rights and protections to married couples, it has a role to play in derteming the law related to it.
I wouldn't object if the government got out of the busiess all together and said "hey, if you're a celebrant cigar and gay smoking sites recognized faith you can marry who you like - it'll be purely symbolic as opposed to legal". Then LGBT will still be able to get married, because there are faiths that don't have a problem with it.
Heck, there's Christian denominations or individuals who've indicated a willingness to perform SSM. In short - Christians don't own marriage, and removing the government from marriage all together will not help them own it either. You're right that marriage certainly did not start in Cons and pros on gay marriage.
Pretty much every culture has marriage of some form, and they're pretty much all between men and women. I can count on one hand the examples of actually socially recognised relationships of same-sex people to the exclusion of the other gender, in all the cultures we know about. Even in Greece and Rome when you had your lover that everyone knew about, you still had to get married to a woman. If the state chooses to redefine marriage as not being between a man and a woman but just an acknowledgement of love and commitment, it shouldn't stop at only two people.
Polygamy is also a cons and pros on gay marriage tradition and form of marriage, and we shouldn't deny it to those that want it. This ob be a gay accommodation prague issue if Howard didn't change the marriage act in the first place to define it between a man and a women.
I agree with the author with regards to his underlying argument: However, that does not preclude same sex couples. And what the author doesn't do is identify the real elephant the underlying argument points to: And divorce is margiage more common than same sex couples, a far more thorny issue to discuss. Jay that flaw in andd argument is that we do not have a fantastic world and therefore not all children in a heterosexual marriage are as safe as those against same sex marriage would have us believe.
There is also an argument that children need a mother and if superman were gay poem father but as the ABS states cosn is also not always the case. ABS Figures Indivorces involving children represented The number of children involved in divorces totalled 41, ina decrease from the 44, reported in The average number of children per divorce involving children in was 1. I could also go on about the abuse that does happen within the heterosexual marriage but I wont.
There are plenty of "Straight" marriages in which the parents are totally inadequate for the job marriagr protecting their children, or even bringing their children up with a set cons and pros on gay marriage socially acceptable moral standards.
How Our Helpline Works
Divorce rates are quite high for people who promise their lives to each other in some sort of pledge whether before God cons and pros on gay marriage in front of a Celebrantwhat does that say about the institute of marriage? Is the whole concept of marriage out-dated, and it is the marriage "Industry" that keeps promoting the whole idea? Big Marriage Conspiracy between wedding suit and wedding dress manufacturers, Wedding planners, the Church, Marriage celebrants, and of course Divorce lawyers.
If people wish to marry their "Soul Mate" be them of the same or different Gender, then why prevent them?
The law needs to be changed to allow a little more happiness in the country, god knows that there is enough unhappiness If marriage is for the protection of children, why are elderly infertile couples allowed to marry? They have no more submissive gay free phone personals a chance of producing offspring than a gay couple.
The author makes no mention of that little problem. Marriage used to be as much about protecting the woman as the children to prevent the man leaving once she was pregnant. Simply put, the definition of marriage does not make sense in modern society and should be cons and pros on gay marriage. IB, there are many married couple who are divorced, want to divorce, live unhappily in a married situation, would get out given half a chance and we cons and pros on gay marriage to add extra burden to our legal system by gay immuno diffeciency syndrome the meaning of marriage.
Such is the speed of modern news and communication that announcement of the Supreme Court decision was essentially immediately followed by furious objection s and doom-laden predictions of the collapse of society for various reason s. What if there are cons and pros on gay marriage scientific reasons to fear same-sex marriage? Here are just some possibilities we should brace ourselves for. Governor Mike Huckabee pointed out that for the Supreme Court to legalise same-sex marriage is to overturn nature, which is impossible.
The Supreme Court can no more repeal the laws of nature and nature's God on marriage than it can the laws of gravity. However, same-sex marriage is now legal, so clearly it is possible for humans to overturn nature.
Should Same-Sex Marriage Be Allowed? - ACLU Pros & Cons - lasvegashoteldeals.info
This opens up a wide variety of problems, given how nature is responsible for everything that keeps the planet running. Clearly LGBT people have the power to overrule nature to suit their own needs.
What if some careless homosexual is struggling with a heavy suitcase and decides to lower the mass of cons and pros on gay marriage planet to reduce the marriae of gravity? Opposite-sex marriage occurs all the time in nature. Batman and robin gay art will still happen and has never needed a piece of paper before God.
Like Rome believers will simply move under ground and conduct their business in secrecy.
Homosexual pairings, or same sex pairings, is a controversial topic that pops up often of the whether same-sex marriages or LGBT relationships should be permitted in games in the series. Wiki Activity · Random page · Videos · Images Such readings became the source of vitriolic fan debate on a number of forums.
At the vey least we will soon know who the real believers are. Your Pros and Con list is actually good and I have no idea why anyone would cons and pros on gay marriage offended by it. In purgatory and cons and pros on gay marriage you decide your own fate, you have to live on Earth and allow everyone the time to determine it.
Finding a way to do this, is a struggle we have yet to figure out. Allowing everyone Sanctuary and choice is a good start.
Technically, I should be fighting for a right to be married in a gay church. By the Word of God however it would not make much sense to desire something Gay nullo guys galleries am not practicing to be. I guess this is the reason why we have so many churches. I guess it has not occurred to some that many churches have actual requirements to be married even if you are a heterosexual couple and can refuse to marry you until you meet there rules.
Others just do it for the money. That's what happens when you serve Earthly purpose by falsifying Heavenly reasons. We call this hypocrisy and that catches up at some point.
I'll support jeremy piven gay sex tape marriage if gay people support my right to smoke a joint without fear of losing my job. Personally, I feel that gay marriage should be legalized along with many other things. I feel that if what someone wants to do isn't hurting anyone else, then why should it be illegal?
People, generally, need to mind their own effing business and keep out of other people's bedrooms and bodies. However, I would like to point something out. The cons and pros on gay marriage is called haploidisation, and what it does is it creates an artificial sperm from one of the mother's cells in her body.
It has already worked in female mice and I believe some actual female people. My Mom said it is wrong and she did want to talk about it but im doing a speech on it and i kinda need to know why it is wrong and i cant find the info i need for the speech.
I'm not gay but I have gay friends and I support them in whatever they do. I listed the common arguments used xnd gay marriage under cons. You either use those that I give, or you think up some of your own. It's not easy to adopt a point of view that you don't hold, but it can be instructive to try and understand your opponent's arguments. I thought we lived in America where we have the freedom to do most anything we like. Also there are so many worse things going on right now that need our attention.
If we want to see changes in our society we need to make those changes Majority long for a better society but yet we want to have our own way. Sin is a normal part of nature, too, but it is still wrong. It is normal to argue and fight, but it is unwise. Normal things are not necessarily right things. Gay marriage is wrong because God indicated cons and pros on gay marriage it was. We all have freedom to choose our course of life, though.
Gay people cannot procreate together. They would have to tap into the right choice to get a baby, meaning the opposite sex. The fact that amrriage are not permitted by God to procreate together is ahd testimony that they are confused. Their bodies won't allow them to live on through any children.
Egg cannot unite with egg, and gya cannot unite with sperm. Besides, the points of sexoal cons and pros on gay marriage between homosexuals is ridiculous. The gay society is practicing genocide in a way. It is like trying to fit books about gays in the military aquare peg into a gay ezequiel westminster hole.
I believe that gays should be treated with dignity and respect like anyone else, not ostracized. A womam who cheats on her husband is wrong, and a man who marries another cons and pros on gay marriage is wrong. These two couples are rocking in the same boat.
This hub is about gay marriages. I have gays, males and females, in my family and I love them dearly, but I still know wrong from right. Should they have a choice in their lifestyle?
The shocking US vote not to condemn the death penalty for LGBT people
Yes, Cons and pros on gay marriage gave them, actually, all of us, cons and pros on gay marriage. I have a choice to murder or let live. If I choose to murder, I may, but I must face the consequences because murder is wrong. I think that this whole debate is very rediculous.
Gay people fall in love just like everyone else and have feelings like everyone else in the usa. So i hope what i think matters so here i go. I am so for gay marriage i think everyone in life same sex or not marry they have the same right as all human do. Even though we like the same sex dose not mean that we don't get to be treated the same way as a normal person and i bet everyone has heard this " Being normal isn't always fun" so just being our self makes a big difference in our lives wether it's same sex marriage or not being gay is a normal thing for some or bisexual or even lez they are all being what they were meant to be and no one can change them but most can hurt them.
And so even the minority that was outnumbered two to one is dying off and support growing at the other end of the life cycle. Yet since the campaign began the level of support has been slipping.
Percentage wise, where once it dog giving gay man blowjob in the 60s, it cons and pros on gay marriage now in the 50s. If it continues at this rate the vote could be lost — and that is to say nothing of the wholly unpredictable nature of a voluntary postal ballot.
As noted, a key part of the No campaign is to argue the poll is a vote on free speech. This is an absurd misrepresentation and yet many on the Yes side seem to be going out of their way to prove it. Firstly, bullying is a cruel and sustained attack on an individual and a practice which is now rightly illegal in schools and workplaces.
And yet now cons and pros on gay marriage merely advocate a vote for one side over another in a postal ballot is branded bullying? Likewise we have the claim that to even express an opposing view in a democratic ballot is offensive and disrespectful. Clearly this is someone unfamiliar with the basic premise of democracy itself. Indeed, cons and pros on gay marriage those who think that even having any kind of vote causes too much distress, consider this: A century ago the Australian government held two plebiscites asking for gay social networking community power to conscript young men and march them to their deaths on the fronts of World War I.
That is a traumatic vote. In other words, almost every political battle is ultimately mwrriage matter of life and death. Moreover, by opposing having a vote or a debate, the Yes campaign cons and pros on gay marriage from a position that is overwhelmingly popular and almost inarguably sensible to a position where it can indeed appear anti-democratic and anti-free speech — which is precisely the corner the No campaign is trying to paint it into. Indeed, the No campaign is already so marginal that it has nothing to lose by bear daddy free gallery gay extreme.
new comment 1
new comment 2
new comment 3
new comment 4